find me on
 
twitter del.icio.us
linkedin flickr
goodreads flixster
facebook aim
dopplr stackoverflow
tweets
 
del.icio.us
 
recent posts
 
history
 
July 2008
M T W T F S S
    Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
 
jason.prado (@) gmail.com real tangible
 
Twitter Updates for 2008-07-13
 
  • maybe no one rides amtrak because they’re hellah late. I hear the view on this route is gorgeous though. #
  • if we could see the internet in the way we see the ocean, would we all stand in awe of it? #
  • @door2lalaland you are my hero. I demand we play catchphrase sometime. #
  • @jbergen did you enjoy your four hour stint in line at the apple store? <3 #
  • http://twitpic.com/3w98 – here’s a crappy picture of the san juan islands. they look great to me. #
Orzo, tomato, feta
 

Simple dish with Mediterranean leanings. The dill really made the dish, in my opinion.

IMG_0121.JPG

Found the recipe on epicurious.

Oh, I’m a fuzzy. I don’t want to talk about that.
 

How many times have you been in a conversation that ended up on a somewhat technical or scientific topic and then had half the participants turn their heads in disgust. “I’m a humanities major, I don’t want to hear about that.” Why do they do this?

Can you imagine if a friend started talking about the election and I said, “I’m a programmer, I have no interest in politics.”? I basically can’t imagine a topic that I would be so averse to that I would immediately tune out of a conversation about. I even enjoy Folahan’s drunken rants on hermeneutics and Joyce and Nabokov. I would never, ever want to talk to someone who would lower themselves by turning away a conversation on one of these topics. So why do so many people, even those allegedly given a liberal education at Stanford University, shun topics of a scientific nature so vigorously?

Actually I don’t really care about the answer to that question. I just want them to stop it.